Sport Structure
Guide with the analysis
Regarding the typology of the organizations presented, from the 21 entities that answered the question:
- 73,9% (n=17) entities, are “not-for-profit”
- 17,4% (n=4) entities are “private company”
- 8,7% (n=2) entities are “public authority”
- It should be noted that two ranked either as “private company” and as “not-for-profit “
Graphic 23 – Typology of organizations
Typology of the Organizations
Results
- Not-for profit 73.9%
- Private Company 17.4%
- Public Authority 8.7%
Regarding the fields of actions of the organizations presented, from the 22 entities that answered the question most referred to more than one field of action:
- • 6 entities referred only to clubs
- • 4 entities referred only to education
- • 3 entities referred concurrently to the field of action education and clubs
- • 2 entities referred only health
- • 2 entities referred concurrently to the field of actions education and health
- • 2 entities referred concurrently to the field of action health and clubs
- • 1 entity has referred only municipality
- • 1 entity has referred 3 fields of action: Education, Clubs and Municipalities
- • 1 entity has referred 4 fields of action
Graphic 24 – Fields of action
Fields of Action
Results
- Education 32.4%
- Health 20.6%
- Clubs 38.2%
- Municipalities 8.8%
As regards the programs / initiatives submitted, one of the 22 respondents to the question, regarding their frequency:
- • 63,6% (n=14) stated that the program / initiative has a regular frequency
- • 18,2% (n=4) stated that the program / initiative has a yearly frequency
- • 9,1% (n=2) reported that the program / initiative has a seasonal frequency
- • 9,1% (n=2) reported other frequencies: o Regional tournaments, National championship with clubs based on disabled institutions and associations.
- o The program was an one-off run in the run-up to, during and after the Paralympic Games in Rio.
Graphic 25 – Frequency of the Program/ Initiative
Frequency of the Program/ Initiative
Results
- Regular (weekly or monthly) 63.6%
- Seasonal (e.g. winter sports program) 9.1%
- Yearly (week long easter program) 18.2%
- Other 9.1%
As regards the programs / initiatives submitted, one of the 20 respondents to the question, about their level of implementation:
- • 7 entities reported that the level of implementation of the program / initiative is local and regional
- • 4 entities stated that the level of implementation of the program / initiative is only local
- • 4 entities stated that the level of implementation of the program / initiative is only regional
- • 2 entities stated that the level of implementation of the program / initiative is only international
- • 2 entities stated that the level of implementation of the program / initiative is local, regional and international
- • 1 entity stated that the level of implementation of the program / initiative is local and international
Graphic 26 – Level of Implementation
Level of Implementation
Results
- Local 14
- Regional 13
- International 5
In the question “Is the project involved on other national, municipal or other programs?” from the 22 entities that responded to this question, it turns out that:
- • 59,1% (n=13) entities stated that the program / initiative is involved in other national, municipal or other programs
- • 40,9% (n=9) entities stated that the program / initiative is not involved in other national, municipal or other programs
Graphic 27 – Answer to the question: Is the project involved in other national, municipal or other programs?
Is the project involved in other national, municipal or other programs?
Results
- yes 59.1%
- no 40.9%
OUR SUPPORTER
OUR PARTNERS
